Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clays and Clay Minerals Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clays and Clay Minerals; February 2000; v. 48; no. 1; p. 106-110
© 2000 Clay Minerals Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ogihara, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

COMPOSITION OF CLINOPTILOLITE FORMED FROM VOLCANIC GLASS DURING BURIAL DIAGENESIS

Shigenori Ogihara

Geological Institute, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

E-mail of corresponding author: ogi{at}tsunami.geol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

The composition of clinoptilolite formed from volcanic glass was investigated from cuttings collected from the offshore MITI-Somaoki borehole, 52 km east of Soma City, Japan. Unaltered volcanic glass and clinoptilolite-replaced glass were found coexisting in the same silicic tuff at 1000 m depth, but unaltered volcanic glass and clinoptilolite did not coexist in individual glass shards, and each material analyzed in this study was pure. The SiO2 and Al2O3 contents of the pure clinoptilolite and the pure, unaltered glass were 69.32 and 13.05 wt. %, and 70.03 and 11.54 wt. %, respectively. The SiO2 content was almost the same and the Al2O3 content was greater in the clinoptilolite-replaced glass compared with the unaltered volcanic glass. As a result, the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio in the clinoptilolite-replaced glass (SiO2/Al2O3 = 5.31) was slightly lower than that of the unaltered volcanic glass (SiO2/Al2O3 = 6.07). The extra-framework cation composition of the clinoptilolite-replaced glass was three times richer in K (K2O = 7.84 wt. %) than the unaltered volcanic glass (K2O 2.59 wt. %). The cation selectivity of clinoptilolite, which shows a preference for K to Ca and Na, played an important role in the concentration of K in clinoptilolite during clinoptilolite formation from volcanic glass, although the initial pore waters and the volcanic glass were not especially relative K.

Clinoptilolite-replaced glass in the calcite-cemented tuff at 1100 m depth was not enriched in Ca, suggesting that the exchangable-cation composition of clinoptilolite did not change by exposure to Ca-rich solutions at this depth. Apparently, the exchangable-cation composition of clinoptilolite, once formed, is relatively stable and difficult to change, even under conditions in which calcite is precipitating on clinoptilolite crystals.

Key Words: Burial Diagenesis • Cation Exchange • Clinoptilolite • Volcanic Glass • Zeolite




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
J.M. Huggett, A.S. Gale, and D.S. Wray
Diagenetic Clinoptilolite and Opal-CT from the Middle Eocene Wittering Formation, Isle of Wight, U.K.
Journal of Sedimentary Research, July 1, 2005; 75(4): 585 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Clay Minerals Society