Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clays and Clay Minerals Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clays and Clay Minerals; December 2000; v. 48; no. 6; p. 699-707
© 2000 Clay Minerals Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Majzlan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Casey, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

SURFACE ENTHALPY OF BOEHMITE

Juraj Majzlan1, Alexandra Navrotsky1 and William H. Casey2

1 Thermochemistry Facility, Department of Geology, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA
2 Land, Water, and Air Resources, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA

E-mail of corresponding author: jmajzlan{at}ucdavis.edu

The persistence of many seemingly metastable mineral assemblages in sediments and soils is commonly attributed to their sluggish transformation to the stable-phase assemblage. Although undoubtedly kinetics plays a major role, this study shows that thermodynamic factors, particularly surface energy, significantly influence the free energy. Enthalpies of formation of boehmite samples with variable surface area were derived using high-temperature oxide-melt calorimetry. The average surface enthalpy for all faces terminating boehmite particles was calculated at +0.52 ± 0.12 J/m2. This value represents the surface enthalpy for surfaces exposed to vacuum assuming that H2O adsorbed on the surface of boehmite is loosely bound. These results show that the enthalpy of formation of boehmite may vary by ≤8 kJ/mol as a function of particle size. An overview of published values of surface energies of gibbsite, {gamma}-Al2O3, corundum, and the results here indicates that the hydrated phases (boehmite, gibbsite) have lower surface energies than the anhydrous phases (corundum, {gamma}-Al2O3). Lower surface energies allow the hydrated phases to maintain high surface area, i.e., small particle size. Similar surface energies of boehmite and gibbsite suggest kinetic control favoring the crystallization of boehmite or gibbsite from aqueous solution. The enthalpy of formation of bulk boehmite from the elements was calculated at –994.0 ± 1.1 kJ/mol. Combining this result with the data in existing thermodynamic databases, we confirm that bulk boehmite is metastable with respect to bulk diaspore at ambient conditions.

Key Words: Boehmite • Enthalpy of Formation • Surface Enthalpy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. Navrotsky, L. Mazeina, and J. Majzlan
Size-Driven Structural and Thermodynamic Complexity in Iron Oxides
Science, March 21, 2008; 319(5870): 1635 - 1638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clays and Clay MineralsHome page
L. Mazeina and A. Navrotsky
SURFACE ENTHALPY OF GOETHITE
Clays and Clay Minerals, April 1, 2005; 53(2): 113 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Navrotsky
Energetic clues to pathways to biomineralization: Precursors, clusters, and nanoparticles
PNAS, August 17, 2004; 101(33): 12096 - 12101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
S. Utsunomiya, S. Utsunomiya, S. C. Peters, J. D. Blum, and R. C. Ewing
Nanoscale mineralogy of arsenic in a region of New Hampshire with elevated As-concentrations in the groundwater
American Mineralogist, November 1, 2003; 88(11-12): 1844 - 1852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Clay Minerals Society