Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clays and Clay Minerals Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clays and Clay Minerals; April 2003; v. 51; no. 2; p. 150-161; DOI: 10.1346/CCMN.2003.0510204
© 2003 Clay Minerals Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deng, Y.
Right arrow Articles by White, G. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

INTERCALATION AND SURFACE MODIFICATION OF SMECTITE BY TWO NON-IONIC SURFACTANTS

Youjun Deng, Joe B. Dixon* and G. Norman White

Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843-2474, USA

* E-mail address of corresponding author: j-dixon{at}tamu.edu

Non-ionic surfactants Brij 56 and Igepal CO 720, containing hydrophilic poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) segments, expanded smectite from 1.5 nm to 1.7 nm at room temperature. The surfactant-smectite composites had larger layer spacings than Ca-smectite after heat treatment. The surfactant-smectite composites were solvated and expanded to 1.8–1.9 nm by polar solvents, glycerol and water, but were not affected by the non-polar or weakly polar solvents, toluene, hexane or octanol. The hydrophilic PEO segments of non-ionic surfactants would logically access the interlayer spaces of smectite whereas the hydrophobic segments extend away from the mineral. The molecular structure and solvation properties suggest that the surfactant molecules are probably concentrated in the margin area of the interlayer galleries forming an annular ring structure between two neighboring silicate sheets. Only two layers or less of the surfactants could access the interlayer galleries of smectite and layer spacings did not exceed 1.8 nm even where excess surfactant was introduced into the composites. The layer spacings of the surfactant-smectite composites were well preserved during water or electrolyte solution washings, indicating stability of most non-ionic surfactant molecules in the interlayer galleries even though ~30% of the adsorbed Igepal CO 720 was desorbed by exhaustive washing. The non-ionic surfactant treatment preserved >80% of the CEC of the smectite. The interlayer cations of the resulting surfactant-smectite were exchangeable as in the untreated smectite. Therefore, the non-ionic surfactant-smectite was much more efficient at removing heavy metal ions than activated carbon or cationic surfactant-treated smectite. The surfactant-smectite composites effectively removed aromatic chlorophenols from a pH 4.9 acetate buffer solution while untreated smectite did not adsorb these molecules. The enhanced adsorption of the aromatic compounds is attributed to the aliphatic segments of the two surfactants.

Key Words: Brij 56 • Chlorophenol • Igepal CO 720 • Intercalation • Non-ionic Surfactant • Organo-clay • Smectite • Surface Properties • Poly(ethylene oxide)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clay MineralsHome page
S. ZIESMER and G. LAGALY
Surface modification of bentonites. VI. Sol-gel transitions of sodium and calcium montmorillonite dispersions in the presence of anionic end-capped poly(ethylene oxides)
Clay Minerals, December 1, 2007; 42(4): 563 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clay MineralsHome page
G. LAGALY and S. ZIESMER
Surface modification of bentonites. V. Sol-gel transitions of Ca-montmorillonite in the presence of cationic end-capped poly(ethylene oxides)
Clay Minerals, June 1, 2007; 42(2): 255 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
Y. Deng, J. B. Dixon, and G. N. White
Adsorption of Polyacrylamide on Smectite, Illite, and Kaolinite
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 6, 2006; 70(1): 297 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clays and Clay MineralsHome page
A. Moronta, N. Iwasa, S.-I. Fujita, M. Shimokawabe, and M. Arai
NICKEL CATALYSTS SUPPORTED ON MgO/SMECTITE-TYPE NANOCOMPOSITES FOR METHANE REFORMING
Clays and Clay Minerals, December 1, 2005; 53(6): 622 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clay MineralsHome page
G. LAGALY and S. ZIESMER
Surface modification of bentonites. III. Sol-gel transitions of Na-montmorillonite in the presence of trimethylammonium- end-capped poly(ethylene oxides)
Clay Minerals, December 1, 2005; 40(4): 523 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clays and Clay MineralsHome page
L. S. Sonon and M. L. Thompson
SORPTION OF A NONIONIC POLYOXYETHYLENE LAURYL ETHER SURFACTANT BY 2:1 LAYER SILICATES
Clays and Clay Minerals, February 1, 2005; 53(1): 45 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Clay Minerals Society