Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clays and Clay Minerals Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clays and Clay Minerals; August 2004; v. 52; no. 4; p. 421-431; DOI: 10.1346/CCMN.2004.0520403
© 2004 Clay Minerals Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baeyens, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY MEASUREMENTS ON ILLITE USING THE SODIUM AND CESIUM ISOTOPE DILUTION TECHNIQUE: EFFECTS OF THE INDEX CATION, ELECTROLYTE CONCENTRATION AND COMPETITION: MODELING

Bart Baeyens* and Michael H. Bradbury

Laboratory for Waste Management, Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland

* E-mail address of corresponding author: bart.baeyens{at}psi.ch

The isotope dilution technique using Na and Cs as index cations was used to determine the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of illite du Puy as a function of background electrolyte composition. The work showed, in accord with previous studies, that the CEC values were in the order Cs-CEC > Na-CEC. Sodium is commonly chosen as the index cation in CEC determinations using the isotope dilution method. The experimentally measured Na-CEC values for Na-illite increased from ~75 to ~200 meq kg–1 for NaClO4 concentrations in the range 5.6x10–4 to 1.25x10–2 M. Cesium CEC determinations showed a much less pronounced trend over a CsNO3 concentration range from 10–3 to 10–2 M. A reference Cs-CEC value of 225 meq kg–1 was chosen. Careful chemical analyses of the supernatant solutions revealed that Ca and Mg at the (sub)µmolar level were present in all the determinations, despite the extensive conditioning procedures used. Competition between (Ca + Mg) and Na for the exchange sites was put forward as an explanation for the variation of Na-CEC values. This hypothesis was confirmed in a series of single (45Ca) and double (45Ca plus 22Na) labeling experiments. Calcium-sodium selectivity coefficients (NaCaKc) were calculated from the experimental data for NaClO4 concentrations from 5.6x10–4 to 0.1 M and exhibited a variation from 1.6 to 14.3. A two-site cation exchange model was developed with site capacities and (NaCaKc) values for each site: planar site capacity =180 meq kg–1, NaCaKcPs = 2; type II site capacity = 45 meq kg–1, NaCaKcII = 80. The model was able to predict the Na and Ca occupancies in the Na-CEC experiments over the whole range of NaClO4 concentrations. It is recommended that Cs should be used instead of Na as the index cation for determining the CEC of illite.

Key Words: Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) • Cesium • Illite du Puy • Isotopic Dilution Technique • Two-site Cation-exchange Model







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Clay Minerals Society