Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sonon, L. S. Articles by Thompson, M. L. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

SORPTION OF A NONIONIC POLYOXYETHYLENE LAURYL ETHER SURFACTANT BY 2:1 LAYER SILICATES

¹ University of Georgia, Soil, Plant, and Water Analysis Laboratory, Athens, Georgia 30602-9150, USA
² Iowa State University, Agronomy Department, Ames IA, 50011-1010, USA

^* E-mail address of corresponding author: mlthomp{at}iastate.edu

To better predict the fate and mobility of surfactants in the environment, sorption and desorption of a nonionic polyoxyethylene lauryl ether surfactant (Brij 35) by two smectites (Wyoming montmorillonite and Panther Creek smectite) and two interstratified mica-vermiculites (IMVs) were investigated by batch techniques, X-ray diffraction, and infrared spectroscopy. Maximum surfactant sorption by smectites ranged from 196 to 256 g kg^–1, whereas the maximum sorption by the IMVs was indeterminate over the range of concentrations employed. Sorption by smectites was best described by the Langmuir model, but sorption by the IMVs showed an S-shaped isotherm, suggesting that cooperative sorption occurred. The surfactant was more readily desorbed from the IMVs than from the smectites in an initial wash with water. After two water washes, 65–75% of the initially sorbed surfactant was retained by the smectite, and 44–51% of the surfactant sorbed to the IMVs remained with the solid phase. In this study, basal spacing of the smectites increased to ~17.5 Å near the sorption maximum, suggesting intercalation of surfactant molecules in the interlamellar regions of the clay. X-ray data also suggested that the surfactant molecules were oriented horizontally in the interlayer spaces. Greater surfactant sorption by the Ca-smectites gradually diminished the intensity of the 1630 cm^–1 infrared band dues to hydration water, indicating that some water had been displaced by the surfactant. The surfactant was also sorbed by the IMV clays, but only on external surfaces and probably via interactions of micelles with the solid phase.

Key Words: Brij 35 • Desorption • Interlayer • Polyoxyethylene

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. ZIESMER and G. LAGALY Surface modification of bentonites. VI. Sol-gel transitions of sodium and calcium montmorillonite dispersions in the presence of anionic end-capped poly(ethylene oxides) Clay Minerals, December 1, 2007; 42(4): 563 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. LAGALY and S. ZIESMER Surface modification of bentonites. V. Sol-gel transitions of Ca-montmorillonite in the presence of cationic end-capped poly(ethylene oxides) Clay Minerals, June 1, 2007; 42(2): 255 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. LAGALY and S. ZIESMER Surface modification of bentonites. III. Sol-gel transitions of Na-montmorillonite in the presence of trimethylammonium- end-capped poly(ethylene oxides) Clay Minerals, December 1, 2005; 40(4): 523 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]