Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McCarty, D. K. Articles by Drits, V. A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

EARLY CLAY DIAGENESIS IN GULF COAST SEDIMENTS: NEW INSIGHTS FROM XRD PROFILE MODELING

¹ Chevron ETC, 3901 Briarpark, Houston, TX, 77063 USA
² Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Science, Pyzevskij per. D.7, 119017 Moscow, Russia

^* E-mail address of corresponding author: dmccarty{at}chevron.com

Samples from different depths in the Oligocene Frio formation (offshore Gulf of Mexico) were studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermal analyses, and scanning electron microscopy. The experimental XRD patterns recorded from oriented and ethylene glycol (EG) solvated clay fractions of the samples were similar to those typical of random, mixed-layered illite-smectite (R0 I-S). The experimental XRD patterns recorded in air-dried (AD) and EG states were simulated using three different models. One of them corresponds to R0 I-S for which thickness and content of the interstratified layers were determined by the rodo technique. The second model is represented by a single homogeneous I-S in which illite and smectite layers are interstratified with a tendency to segregation. The expandability of the segregated I-S model varies from 48% to 75% without any rational relationship between the smectite layer content and depth.

The third model assumes that the clay fraction is a physical mixture of smectite and an R0 I-S. In this model the I-S contains 65% illite and 35% smectite layers independent of depth, whereas the smectite content varies from 28% to 63%. This model has consistently smaller profile factors, R_p, for both EG and AD XRD scans compared with the R_p values determined for the other two models.

The mineralogical association, volcanic origin, narrow stratigraphic interval (427 m), and low maximum temperature (42°C) of the studied Frio Formation are considered. These features are completely consistent with the two-phase model and so the segregation model must be rejected. An authigenic origin of the pure smectite and an alternative detrital or authigenic origin of the R0 I-S are discussed.

Key Words: Diagenesis • Gulf Coast • Illite-Smectite • Frio Formation • Smectite

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. K. McCarty, B. A. Sakharov, and V. A. Drits New insights into smectite illitization: A zoned K-bentonite revisited American Mineralogist, November 1, 2009; 94(11-12): 1653 - 1671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. A. Drits and B. B. Zviagina TRANS-VACANT AND CIS-VACANT 2:1 LAYER SILICATES: STRUCTURAL FEATURES, IDENTIFICATION, AND OCCURRENCE Clays and Clay Minerals, August 1, 2009; 57(4): 405 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Lanson, B. A. Sakharov, F. Claret, and V. A. Drits Diagenetic smectite-to-illite transition in clay-rich sediments: A reappraisal of X-ray diffraction results using the multi-specimen method Am J Sci, June 1, 2009; 309(6): 476 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]